75
submitted 11 months ago by Violett_Queen@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Will this one-by-one system forever be our main thing or do you think we will break monogamy and maybe "team up" as groups or something?

And yeah polygamy is a thing but do you think it will catch on to "the upper class"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ooli@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

we're heading toward monogamy at the main relationship status. Biologicaly it the best model for offspring survival

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

But it takes a village to raise a child

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 15 points 11 months ago

That is just extended family and friend relationships. Not a whole village of romantic partners.

[-] pavnilschanda@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Maybe that's why poly is becoming a thing; it makes sense in America since its individualism ensures that children are independent of their parents, and especially extended family most of the time. Back in the day, children would still stay with their parents even when they have children themselves (and this is returning with inflations getting worse. Heck, there are even traditional housing systems where there is one "apartment" that consists of one extended family. But now, at least in the States, children can travel miles away from their family and pay them a visit only once in a while; so there's no constant handling of children like in the old days. I suppose teachers can fill this role as well, but teachers handle groups of children at the time. They may or may not get individualized needs that need to be addressed that only an adult who lives with them can provide.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago
[-] ooli@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Polygamy is great- source: the quran.

Not all of us with different opinion than yours are religious.

Monogamy prevent killing of rival's baby and protect kids Thoses studies might be biased by moral ground But the correlation between testes size and polygamous relationship is well studied. Right now, Humans fall in the midrange: not as promiscuious as a chimp but not monogamous. But seing how tiny your balls are compared to your dad, we're certainly heading to full monogamous territory😱

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I dont care about teste size.

We have other ways of preventing infanticide.

Not being religious doesn't mean you don't have cultural biases rooted in religion.

Linking random articles doesn't make an argument stronger, just appear stronger.

You really think that we're at the point as a species where we need to structure our society by comparing it to what chimps do?

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
75 points (77.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1333 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS