1
7

From the opinion piece:

Our research at MIT helped make the case for ride-sharing. We were wrong. We don’t want to make the same mistake with robotaxis ...

2
79

Our research was technically right, but we had not taken into account changes in human behavior. Cars are more convenient and comfortable than walking, buses and subways — and that is why they are so popular. Make them even cheaper through ride-sharing and people are coaxed away from those other forms of transit.

This dynamic became clear in the data a few years later: On average, ride-hailing trips generated far more traffic and 69% more carbon dioxide than the trips they displaced.

We were proud of our contribution to ride-sharing but dismayed to see the results of a 2018 study that found that Uber Pool was so cheap it increased overall city travel: For every mile of personal driving it removed, it added 2.6 miles of people who otherwise would have taken another mode of transportation.

3
303
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Uber was supposed to help traffic. It didn’t. Robotaxis will be even worse::px-captcha

view more: next ›

Lemmy.institute

49 readers
0 users here now

Looking for a new home for your community of nerds? You've come to the right place. Lemmy.institute was created as a home for all kind of science and technology-related communities.

Community Guidelines

Please be respectful toward fellow members of the fediverse. We encourage open discussion, but we do not tolerate spam, harassment, or disrespectful behaviour. Let’s keep it civil!

Pornographic (NSFW) contents are not allowed.

Do you want to create and moderate a new community? Post a request at c/communityrequest

Misc

founded 1 year ago
ADMINS