21

Damn, this is a sad day for the homelab.

The article says Intel is working with partners to "continue NUC innovation and growth", so we will see what that manifests as.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Jesus Christ. Why does it feel like tech industry is just getting shittier and more expensive, while all the cool consumer options are being axed. Intel Nucs were a relatively cheap way to get a cute little desktop machine or a home server. I am sad that they're going away. I guess there's always Minisforum, but still...

[-] roofuskit@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Because infinite growth of profits on a finite planet.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 0 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is unsustainable. We're seeing what happens in late capitalism. The belts tighten, the workers get left in the dust, the products consumers actually want get the axe.

[-] snarf@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

While companies today are certainly overzealous in their drive for growth, it is a myth that infinite economic growth is impossible. It is not only possible but necessary: https://medium.com/@oliverwaters_76079/the-strange-necessity-of-infinite-economic-growth-ebc2e505cdf1

[-] roofuskit@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Only two kinds of people believe in infinite growth; economists and psychopaths.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Infinite growth is cancer's credo.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah this part bothers me. To these companies a solid profit stream is not viable. It has to be iPhone level growth year after year or they think it’s failing and axe it. It’s quite annoying. Eventually you will hit a plateau. That just means it’s a mature market, not failing. Grrrr…

[-] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You see the same shit on streaming services. "Oh this show has been out for two days and hasn't reached Game of Thrones level of popularity already? Let's remove it from existence forever."

[-] EDRBd97kWbT2KzK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Intel NUCs were very good machines but honestly they were completely overpriced compared to Chuwi/Minisforum/etc.

My guess is they were just not enough sales, that's all.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Chip shortage. Since COVID, chip companies have been having a really hard time getting properly restocked. This impacts all electronics industries. Cars, computers, even Apple had to redesign some of their products to accommodate the shortages, so has many other companies big and small. The Raspberry Pi prices have soared. So products that take a chip away from a more mainstream or lucrative market are being axed.

[-] NotAPenguin@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Probably because people aren't spending their money on it.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Every time I've had a use for these either a business PC (or ex-business referb for home) has always been a better, cheaper answer.

[-] hschen@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Oh man i was thinking of getting one of these to replace my raspberry pi

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Lenovo or HP mini PC would be a much better bang for your buck.

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

They're also a lot bigger and don't really fall under the same miniPC classification.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not a lot bigger than a NUC. My HP mini PC's footprint is like 8"x8"

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And NUCs are usually 4x4. That's literally half the footprint.

Edit: a quarter of the size. This is why I don't do math before coffee.

[-] Savas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe ironically with the prices dropping on these people will actually buy them..

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

They were too pricy for me. I ended up with Bee-link machines (SER4/5/5Pro) and am happy with them.

[-] jalim@jalim.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

The article makes it sound they cost over $1,000 (USD?) and were impossible to find but here in Australia I never had any issues finding and unless you were going for the extreme versions, there closer to $5-600AUD which made them a great fit. All we can hope is that there’s a few other brands who are willing to fill the space with equal quality products.

[-] Savas@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Sad really, but the issue, as someone as mentioned already is they were too expensive.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39677 readers
1622 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS