62
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

They will all be thoughtful genocide supporters.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

Who vote against net neutrality?

[-] disguised_doge@kbin.earth 10 points 4 hours ago

What, disinformation from a government? I'm shocked, shocked I say.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 22 points 5 hours ago

They can join lemmy.ml with the rest of the people who have 100 accounts each.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Ironic comment to post in this article.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 30 points 7 hours ago

Im sure plenty of these already exist

[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 hours ago
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 14 points 7 hours ago

You don't need AI for this, you just need to pay some Russians in vodka and fuzzy hats, Trump learned that years ago.

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

this is insane. why can't we vote for them not to be able to do this? isn't this a democracy?

[-] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Whose deepfake influencers do you "trust" more? US, China, russia and a few lesser players are already working to control the information space / spread propaganda (note: not necessarily lies, but there is typically a focus or spin) far and wide.

We know people are highly influenced by propaganda (some more than others, but all of us are) and that quantity and repetition plays a role. Since this is now an established battlefield, I'd like our (western) defences to be strong.

It has potential for abuse, certainly. That's par for the course. There is also the potential for it to be used to debunk fake news, shock people out of false beliefs, and help reconnect people to reality. Let's see how this plays out. popcorn time

[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

And the internet keeps getting more, and more dead.

[-] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Hah. I hadn't seen that article / heard of the theory, but as far as crackpot theories/hypotheses go, it's one of the more likely (edit: to come about). I doubt it's anywhere near the majority yet, personally.

It was already obvious that propaganda news articles (on obscure websites) had orchestrated releases and promotion on social media, in a massive circle jerk, and I assumed machine generated/assisted content was involved. Then ChatGPT hit the headlines and we all had the power.

[-] Draghetta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Of course, the theory is exaggerated.

But to be honest, every time I’m watching a video on yourube with more than a hundred comments and any kind of political relevance, I just assume at least 90% of the comments are bots. Same goes for twitter arguments.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -4 points 6 hours ago

So they can save money by firing their army of nafo meat puppets?

[-] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 hours ago

well if they do this, then they're contributing to the poisoning of LLMs which may be a good or bad thing depending on your usage of chatgpt services

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Humanity isn't even "good" enough to not poison LLM's in the first place. I respect the optimism, though.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
62 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

58737 readers
5069 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS