73
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“It is a collective failure, but it was right to make this movie.”

This is how out of touch they are. If it wasn't the right movie, format, sequel, promoting, or timing for it, then it was actually the wrong call. You can tell, you know, by the results?

[-] Hoimo@ani.social 17 points 1 week ago

Nah, plenty of cult classics failed when they came out, but would be impossible to create at the time they became popular. So if you have an artistic vision and an opportunity to realize it, it doesn't matter if the masses are ready for it, you should go for it. If the goal was creating a musical with Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix, the time was now and the result is at least interesting enough to be culturally viable. We'll have to check in 20 years to see if it has any staying power as a cult classic.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

I liked it.

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I called it based on only ever hearing the title. You have to have made a ton of bad choices to wind up at a place where that title seems like a good idea

Given the context of Harley and Joker's relationship, it's actually an incredibly appropriate title. People just didn't follow entertainment news so they had no idea it was a jukebox musical.

[-] Glowstick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No, its pretentious and not understandable to a huge percent of people. Exactly how the movie is according to all reviews. It doesn't matter if the technical meaning of the phrase is applicable or not. It's an obviously bad title for a mass market movie. For an art film showing at indie theaters it would be ok, but for a mass market film it's a horrible title that screams "this movie is cringe!"

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I mean, the first one felt like an art film. Sure, it uses the Batman IP, but when I watched it I didn't get the feeling that it was expected to have mass market appeal.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you. I agree.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

No test screenings. Oopsie.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

From everything I'm reading were they even trying to be successful? I've heard a lot of stuff about how it was basically a character assassination cuz they didn't like the fans and how they related to the character? Is that accurate?

[-] janonymous@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Who would intentionally put their time and effort into a movie, risk hurting their careers and risk losing the studios money? And all that to upset fans of the characters?

That movie could have easily went the way of Batgirl and be shelved for a tax cut.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I honestly think Joaquin Phoenix is the kind of guy who would do all of that. I also think when your movie makes like a billion dollars you probably have a lot more creative control on the sequel than the people who directed Batgirl did. Not that I'm saying that's what happened, it just freaking looks like it.

Can you blame them? Who are the biggest vocal Joker fans?

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

You can't use box office take to measure a movie's success.

Shawshank Redemption is often regarded as the best movie of all time. It was a box office flop.

Battlefield Earth is often regarded as the worst movie of all all time. It was also a box office flop.

Using those two examples, obviously the only true measure of a movie's long term success is whether or not they overuse Dutch angles.

If Folie a Deux doesn't use a shit load of Dutch angles, maybe it'll turn out OK.

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 12 points 1 week ago

$100 says this movie bombs now and becomes a cult classic years from now.

[-] Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

I've been saying the same thing

[-] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Seems like prime cult classic material to me.

[-] Pringles@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm going to watch it tonight with my wife and despite the massive amount of negative reviews, I'm quite sure we will both like it.

Update: We liked it.

[-] GoosLife@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I watched it with my girlfriend. We both liked it. All the negativity seemed really exaggerated to me. I hope you guys will like it, too.

[-] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 6 points 1 week ago

When I watched Sweeney Todd in theaters, half of the audience left when Johny Depp started singing. They didn't know what they signed up for.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think they'll make their money back, but I don't think part trois will be forthcoming.

[-] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

That article led me to this one, and now I think I want to see it for myself. Heavy spoiler warning: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-features/joker-2-ending-angered-fans-1236025470/

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Because it was fucking awesome, that's why. I don't know what people wanted a Joker sequel to be, but it was great. I do understand why some wouldn't like it, but quite frankly I thought it was on-par with the original.

[-] JoShmoe@ani.social -3 points 1 week ago

Me and an old roommate of mine tried watching the first. It was too depressing to finish, we didn’t bother. This image I assume taken from the sequel isn’t very promising.

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago

Apparently this new one is a musical. This movie might be bad, but I really think it may be failing because the demographic for this one vs the first one are completely different. We'll see, I'm going to watch it tonight.

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
73 points (92.0% liked)

Movies

7324 readers
310 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS