We should probably use upx to package executable in torrenting space (Discussion) (upx.github.io)

submitted 4 days ago by Linuxer@discuss.online to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

UPX is open source and works on linux , windows and mac (ie. cross platform) I would like to know why the torrenting space isn't using it already / having a mature discussion about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 16 points 4 days ago

Sorry, I meant antivirus. (Corpo IT calls it endpoint, since it's, well, the endpoint.)

[-] Linuxer@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago

. Malware is enough of a problem that there’s no way I’d want to start downloading crap that’s been UPXed since that’s going to make it impossible to determine if it’s legitimate or not by (most) endpoint tools, or they’ll just see UPX and go ‘bad shit!’ on everything.

You had clearly misunderstood what this tool is. Its tool for better compression of executables which could be used in data sensitive (Like , most people would agree with me that some times decrypting on our own local device could be better since it could be more predictable than waiting for seeders , because there are very less seeders)

[-] montar@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

He didn't, malware guys use UPX and it's true that antiviruses scream bloody murder when they see it. It's also true you can't see what's inside unless you have special tools to do so. UPX also has one huge downside, it's its RAM usage, due to it's inner workings it's unable to use optimisations that normal binaries can like page sharing.

[-] Linuxer@discuss.online 0 points 3 days ago

okay so what alternative do you suggest which could be better used in exe formats I feel that unzipping from exe isn't the best solution to this problem

(like some exe contain some zip file inside them and extract them)