155
submitted 2 months ago by lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] akincisor@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 months ago

It's called git. It's been distributed from day 1. GitHub was an attempt to centralize it.

[-] gomp@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 months ago

Yeah... does git have issue tracking? actions? C'mon: it's not like github & co. are just git.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 points 2 months ago

Again, like OP said, those are typically distinct functionality: issue tracking, source control, deployment etc. GitHub bringing everything into one platform is atypical and obviously done for the goal of centralization. The more stuff you add to a platform the harder it makes it to leave or replicate.

But no, technically speaking you don't need to have all of it in one place. There's no reason for which you must manage everything together.

I don't even understand why people like GitHub so much, its source management sucks. The fact it still doesn't have a decent history visualization to this day is mind-boggling.

Look for ways to do things separately and you will find much better tools. GitHub's "one size fits all" approach is terrible and only holds because people are too lazy to look for any alternative.

[-] intrepid@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I don't even understand why people like GitHub so much, its source management sucks.

I agree with this part.

GitHub bringing everything into one platform is atypical and obviously done for the goal of centralization.

Perhaps this is part of the answer to why people like github. Unlike you, most people love all-in-one tools. I once suggested a bunch of offline tools to use with git, with much better user experience than github. The other person was like, "Yeah, no! I don't want to learn that many tools".

Look for ways to do things separately and you will find much better tools.

The advantage of a centralized app is that all the services you mentioned are integrated well with each other. The distinct and often offline tools often have poor integration with each other. This is harder to achieve in such tools, compared to centralized hosts. The minimum you need to start with is a bunch of standards for all these tools to follow, so that interoperability is possible later.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
155 points (90.6% liked)

Open Source

30263 readers
82 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS