172
submitted 7 months ago by 0485919158191@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Basically title.

I’m wondering if a package manager like flatpak comes with any drawback or negatives. Since it just works on basically any distro. Why isn’t this just the default? It seems very convenient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

For me, the question is why I should add an extra layer of complexity. If the things I use already work well using apt, and if most things are bundled in the default distro install, then my life is already good.

This all depends on your software needs, if course. Some people are using a lot of new stuff, so the above setup leads to annoying situations.

[-] YamiYuki@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 7 months ago

Some developers don't want to deal with building an app for multiple versions. Sure some DEBs can work without needing to deal with that, but some don't.

[-] gnumdk@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

some devs don't want to debug last arch/ubuntu broken setup.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
172 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

47343 readers
1382 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS