542
submitted 10 months ago by tekeous@usenet.lol to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Air is better than water

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Technically, no, air is a much worse thermal conductor, and most liquids are significantly better. It's a pretty efficient thermal INSULATOR, however.

The practical applications, however, make the movement of air OUT of your system an efficient cooling method.

[-] somtwo@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

Not trying to be contrarian or a smart-ass, but aren't water cooled systems kinda just air cooled systems with the radiator moved elsewhere?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 21 points 10 months ago

Yes. The advantage is that you can make the surface area of the air cooling part much, much larger. I had a water cooled system that could do web browsing and other basic tasks with zero fan speed (though it was better to leave it on very low speed to avoid hunting behavior).

Also, there's some benefits to thermal mass. Short term spikes can be absorbed by the water without increasing fan speed.

[-] crystal@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

I had a water cooled system that could do web browsing and other basic tasks with zero fan speed

Isn't that the default for (air cooled) notebooks?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

With CPUs with very low TDPs, yes.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 points 10 months ago

I once built a home theatre PC that was completely passively cooled. The case was basically the entire heat sink. It got the heat from the CPU through heatpipes. Unfortunately the shitty motherboard died due to unreleased reasons and since then I didn't have the time or money to revive it.

The cases aren't even built anymore. No idea why, it was really cool.

[-] tryptaminev@feddit.de 12 points 10 months ago

Every liquid cooling system is pretty much that. Eventually you need to give it to the outside and the outside is usually air. Heck even river cooling for Power plants ends up "air cooling" through the rivers surface.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All of that air cooling is just radiation cooling in the end

[-] InputZero@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

All of that radiation cooling is just entropy cooling in the end.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 1 points 10 months ago

The heat is not going anywhere in the long run though.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I think that the point is to get a much bigger radiator by moving it to a less cramped location. The point is to make the process more efficient, not to change its nature.

[-] the_third@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Not if you use water from the tap. A friend of mine in college did that when he had a water flatrate in his appartment. Worked pretty well.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It is now frowned upon to waste clean water in this fashion.

[-] the_third@feddit.de 0 points 10 months ago

Nah, not everywhere. Our village has no water meters because, why. Spring water from the mountains is not treated, only monitored for microorganisms and contaminants and fed into our water supply by gravity. Doesn't really matter if it runs through a computer on its way to the sea or not.

In places like big cities or flat plains where the water needs to be pumped and treated that's a different thing.

load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
542 points (93.6% liked)

Memes

45180 readers
1493 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS